We live in a world of overwhelming complexity where a single person can be framed as a hero, a villain, a trendsetter, or a sellout, depending on who’s telling the story, and the same goes for organizations and phenomena.
This may be typical for human beings, but it may also be a sign of the times in a post-normal world where the tension between the desire for simplicity and the acceptance of complexity drives more people to respond to reality with emotions rather than rational cognitive skills.
But what if we could step back and observe reality through a neutral, interdisciplinary lens? What if we had a “periodic table” for understanding how individuals, trends, and cultural moments unfold and connect?
After some research we came up with the below framework for observing Earth, life and humans: 12 ways to categorize reality, applied to Harry Styles as a case study.
Just for the record: we have nothing against Styles.
We simply wanted to use a well-known individual (rather than an organization or a phenomenon) as an example to highlight how his public persona, career, and cultural impact can describe how to see patterns, challenge narratives, and ask better questions about any event or individual.
The 12 Lenses of Observation
1. By Domain of Reality
Every person, trend, or cultural phenomenon exists across multiple dimensions—not just one. Think of these domains as layers of an onion: peel one back, and you reveal another. Whether it’s the physical body, the digital footprint, or the psychological impact, each layer tells a different part of the story. Ignoring any of them risks missing the full picture.
Let’s take a look at what “layers” of existence does Harry Styles occupy:
| Domain | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Physical | Bodily, material | His gender-fluid fashion (e.g., wearing dresses on magazine covers). |
| Biological | Health, genetics, physiology | His public discussions about mental health and therapy. |
| Technological | Digital presence, tools | His use of social media (e.g., Instagram, TikTok) to connect with fans. |
| Cultural | Symbolic, narrative, artistic | His music and persona as a challenge to traditional masculinity. |
| Social | Collective behavior, fandom | The community of “Harries” (his fanbase) and their activism. |
| Economic | Systems of exchange, industry | His contracts, tours, and merchandise as part of the music industry’s economy. |
| Political | Power, influence | His subtle political statements (e.g., wearing a “VOTE” necklace, supporting LGBTQ+ rights). |
| Psychological | Individual/collective mind | The emotional connection fans feel to his vulnerability and authenticity. |
As you see, Harry Styles isn’t just a pop star—he’s a cultural artifact that touches fashion, mental health, digital culture, economics, and politics. Ignoring any of these domains leaves the picture incomplete.
2. By Scale
Scale determines who feels the effects and how long they last. A single tweet might seem micro, but if it goes viral, it can ripple outward to meso (communities) or even macro (global) levels. Understanding scale helps us see where the real leverage points are—and where the blind spots might be.
What is the scope of Harry Styles’ impact?
| Scale | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Micro | Individual | His personal style choices (e.g., nail polish, dresses). |
| Meso | Community, industry | His influence on the music industry (e.g., pushing boundaries of pop masculinity). |
| Macro | National, global | His global fanbase and cultural impact on gender norms. |
| Temporal | Duration | His evolution from One Direction to solo artist (2010–present). |
Why it matters: Styles’s gender-fluid fashion started as a micro personal choice but had macro effects on global conversations about masculinity.
3. By Type of Change
Not all change is created equal. Some shifts are predictable and gradual, like the slow turn of a ship. Others are sudden and disruptive, like an earthquake. And some are cyclic, repeating patterns we’ve seen before. Recognizing the type of change helps us anticipate what comes next and whether we’re dealing with a trend or a transformation.
How does Harry Styles alter the status quo?
| Type | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Linear | Predictable, incremental | His gradual shift from boy band member to solo artist. |
| Nonlinear | Sudden, disruptive | His 2019 Met Gala dress (a bold, unexpected statement). |
| Cyclic | Recurring patterns | The cycle of pop stars challenging norms (e.g., Bowie, Prince, Harry). |
| Emergent | Unpredictable from simple interactions | The viral fan theories and memes about his lyrics and aesthetics. |
| Stasis | Resistance to change | The backlash from traditionalists against his gender-fluid image. |
Why it matters: His Met Gala dress was a nonlinear moment that disrupted expectations and accelerated conversations about gender fluidity in pop culture.
4. By Agency
Agency reveals who’s pulling the strings and who’s just along for the ride. Is the change driven by human intention, algorithmic amplification, or structural forces (like industry norms or cultural expectations)? Understanding agency helps us separate the puppeteers from the puppets.
Who or what is driving Harry Styles’ cultural impact?
| Agency | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Human | Deliberate or accidental | His intentional choices (e.g., fashion, lyrics). |
| Hybrid | Human + non-human interactions | His collaboration with designers, stylists, and social media algorithms. |
| Algorithmic | Driven by code/systems | How TikTok and Instagram amplify his image. |
| Structural | Embedded in systems | The music industry’s demand for innovation and fan culture’s hunger for authenticity. |
Why it matters: His gender-fluid image is a hybrid of his personal choices, the fashion industry’s trends, and social media’s amplification.
5. By Narrative Role
Every person or phenomenon plays a role in a bigger story. Are they the hero, the villain, the trickster, or the fool? Are they part of a mythic rebirth, a tragic downfall, or a satirical expose? Narrative roles shape how we remember, interpret, and react to what we see.
How does Harry Styles fit into larger cultural stories?
| Role | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Heroic | A triumph or breakthrough | His challenge to toxic masculinity in pop culture. |
| Tragic | A failure or loss | The backlash and hate he faces for breaking norms. |
| Comedic | Irony or absurdity | The meme-ification of his “watermelon sugar” aesthetic. |
| Satirical | Exposing hypocrisy | His subversion of “lad culture” in British pop. |
| Mythic | Archetypal or symbolic | His position as a “modern Prince”, a gender-fluid pop icon. |
| Liminal | Threshold moments | His transition from boy band to solo artist as a rite of passage. |
What is his impact? He plays a mythic role as the “modern Prince”, a gender-fluid icon who challenges and redefines pop masculinity.
6. By Systemic Impact
Nothing exists in a vacuum. A single action – like a tweet, a fashion choice, or a song – can have immediate effects, ripple effects, and even paradigm-shifting consequences decades later. Systemic impact helps us trace the dominoes and see where they might fall next.
How does Harry Styles affect interconnected systems?
| Impact | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| First-Order | Immediate, direct effects | His album releases and tours. |
| Second-Order | Indirect, ripple effects | The rise of gender-fluid fashion in pop culture. |
| Third-Order | Long-term, paradigm-shifting | The normalization of masculinity beyond stereotypes for future generations. |
| Feedback Loops | Events that reinforce or disrupt cycles | His fanbase’s activism (e.g., supporting LGBTQ+ rights) reinforcing his brand. |
Why it matters: His gender-fluid fashion had first-order effects (album sales) but third-order effects (redefining masculinity for a generation).
7. By Observational Lens
How we look at something changes what we see. A scientist might focus on data, while an artist sees aesthetics, and a philosopher ponders ethics. Each lens offers a different truth—and the more we use, the closer we get to the whole story.
What discipline or perspective is used to interpret Harry Styles?
| Lens | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific | Empirical, measurable | Data on his album sales, streaming numbers, and social media engagement. |
| Historical | Contextual, longitudinal | His place in the lineage of gender-bending pop stars (Bowie, Prince, etc.). |
| Anthropological | Cultural meaning | His role as a symbol of Gen Z’s rejection of binary gender norms. |
| Philosophical | Existential or ethical | The ethics of celebrity influence on cultural change. |
| Artistic | Aesthetic or emotional | His music videos and stage aesthetics as visual storytelling. |
| Futurist | Projective | How his career might influence the next generation of pop stars. |
| Conspiracist | Alternative narratives | Fan theories about hidden meanings in his lyrics or aesthetics. |
Why it matters: From a historical lens, he’s part of a lineage of gender-bending pop stars; from an anthropological lens, he’s a symbol of Gen Z values.
8. By Time Horizon
Time gives events context and consequence. Is this a fleeting moment, a recurring cycle, or a threshold into something new? Understanding time horizons helps us connect the dots between what was, what is, and what could be.
How does Harry Styles relate to past, present, and future?
| Horizon | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Past | Roots, causes, precedents | His influences (Bowie, Prince, Freddie Mercury). |
| Present | Immediate context | His 2020s era of gender-fluid pop. |
| Future | Potential outcomes | Will he inspire a new wave of gender-fluid artists? |
| Ahistorical | Defies linear time | His timeless, androgynous aesthetic (e.g., 1970s glam + modern pop). |
Does it matter? His androgynous aesthetic draws from the past (Bowie, Prince) but feels ahistorical—like it could belong to any era.
9. By Value System
Values are the invisible filters we use to decide what’s “good” or “bad.” Is something judged by its outcomes, its intentions, or its alignment with universal principles? Recognizing the value system at play helps us see why people disagree and where the real debates lie.
What moral or ethical framework is used to judge Harry Styles?
| Value System | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Utilitarian | Greatest good for the greatest number | Does his gender-fluid image help or harm societal progress? |
| Deontological | Duty-based | Should celebrities use their platform to challenge norms, regardless of backlash? |
| Virtue Ethics | Character-based | Does he act with authenticity and courage? |
| Relativist | Context-dependent | Is his gender fluidity “brave” in the West but “dangerous” in other cultures? |
| Absolutist | Universal principles | Freedom of expression is a fundamental right, regardless of context. |
| Nihilist | Rejection of meaning | “It’s just pop culture—none of it matters.” |
Why it matters: Critics might judge him through a relativist lens (“This is harmful in some cultures”), while fans see him through a virtue ethics lens (“He’s brave and authentic”).
10. By Epistemology
Epistemology asks: What counts as evidence? Is our understanding based on data, stories, personal experience, or faith? How we “know” something shapes what we believe and what we might be missing.
How do we “know” Harry Styles?
| Epistemology | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Empirical | Observed through data/senses | Streaming numbers, ticket sales, poll data on his influence. |
| Narrative | Known through stories | Media narratives about his “revolutionary” fashion. |
| Experiential | Lived firsthand | Fans’ personal connections to his music and persona. |
| Theoretical | Modeled or predicted | Cultural studies theories about his impact on gender norms. |
| Intuitive | “Gut feeling” or subjective | “He just feels authentic.” |
| Revealed | Through faith or prophecy | Fan theories about “hidden messages” in his lyrics or aesthetics. |
Why it matters: We “know” Harry Styles through empirical data (sales), narratives (media), and experiential connections (fans’ emotions).
11. By Complexity
Some things are simple and linear (like flipping a light switch). Others are complicated but solvable (like building a rocket). Then there are the complex, emergent phenomena (like viral trends) and the truly chaotic (like riots). Knowing the complexity helps us manage expectations and avoid frustration.
How predictable or chaotic is Harry Styles’ cultural impact?
| Complexity | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | Clear cause-and-effect | His album releases leading to tour dates. |
| Complicated | Multiple causes, but knowable | His career strategy (music, fashion, activism). |
| Complex | Emergent, unpredictable | The viral fan culture around his persona. |
| Chaotic | No discernible pattern | The unpredictable backlash from traditionalists. |
Why it matters: His fan culture is complex, emergent, unpredictable, and shaped by millions of individual interactions.
12. By Stakeholders
Every event has winners, losers, bystanders, and hidden players. Who’s directly impacted? Who benefits silently? Who’s erased from the conversation? Mapping stakeholders reveals who really matters and who’s being left out.
Who is affected or involved in Harry Styles’ cultural impact?
| Stakeholders | Definition | Harry Styles Example |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | Immediately impacted | His fans (Harries) and haters. |
| Indirect | Ripple effects | Young artists inspired by his gender fluidity. |
| Hidden | Unseen or marginalized | LGBTQ+ youth who see him as a symbol of acceptance. |
| Beneficiaries | Who gains? | Fashion brands, record labels, and media outlets profiting from his image. |
| Perpetrators | Who caused it? | His team (managers, stylists, PR) and himself. |
| Bystanders | Those who observe but don’t act | Casual listeners who don’t engage with the deeper cultural impact. |
Why it matters: His gender-fluid image directly impacts fans and haters, but indirectly inspires young artists and benefits fashion brands.
Why care?
By running Harry Styles through this framework we can see that he is more than a pop star, he’s a cultural Rorschach test. In other words, by using these 12 lenses, we can see how one individual’s choices ripple across fashion, mental health, politics, and economics.
We can link the answers this framework gives about Harry Styles to train ourselves to see the layered AND patterned reality:
- Spot patterns: How have gender norms evolved in pop culture and how do they keep on evolving?
- Challenge narratives: Who has benefitted from labeling him a “hero” or “sellout” before and who’s doing it today?
- Anticipate outcomes: What are the long-term effects of his gender-fluid image?
- See the invisible: Who’s really shaping his persona (fans? algorithms? corporations?)?
The world isn’t just happening to us. We’re part of the systems that shape it. The more lenses we use, the clearer the picture becomes.
Your Turn
Pick anything that is important for you (a musician, an actor or a politician, or a phenomenon or an organization if you want to challenge yourself) and apply one of these lenses in the comments. What do you see that you hadn’t noticed before?
(Want a deeper dive? Reply with a name – Kate Bush, European Central Bank, Greta Thunberg, Volodymyr Zelensky, The Republican party, Lapland, Dior, public school system – and I’ll analyze them using this framework.)
2 thoughts on “12 Ways to Categorize Reality”